Written by Jonathan Markson.
CNN has once again shown its uncanny ability to spin reality into a feel-good story. In this latest gem, the news outlet reports that a brave snake has “heroically” saved a fish from drowning. Yes, you read that correctly—CNN has managed to transform a simple act of nature into a heartwarming tale of reptilian bravery. Never mind that the fish was actually being eaten by the snake. Who needs reality when you have a narrative to sell?
This remarkable feat of storytelling has left viewers both bewildered and amused. The snake, a mere garden variety water snake, was simply following its instinctual behavior when it caught a fish in a nearby pond. But according to CNN, this wasn’t just any snake—it was a “lifeguard of the animal kingdom,” swooping in to save the day. The fish, meanwhile, was portrayed as a helpless victim of water, apparently unaware that its natural habitat is, well, water. But why let biology get in the way of a good story?
The coverage has sparked a wave of mockery on social media, with users questioning whether CNN’s next headline will feature a wolf heroically “rescuing” a sheep from boredom. It seems that in the world of 24-hour news, the line between reality and satire is becoming increasingly blurred. But don’t worry, folks—CNN assures us that this is all in the name of good, wholesome reporting.
A New Standard in Journalism
CNN’s coverage of the “hero snake” incident marks a new low—or perhaps a new high, depending on how you look at it—in the world of modern journalism. Gone are the days when news outlets simply reported the facts. Now, it’s all about the spin, the narrative, the story that can tug at your heartstrings or make you feel warm and fuzzy inside, even if it’s completely divorced from reality.
In this case, CNN managed to transform what should have been a straightforward report on nature into an epic saga of survival and heroism. Forget the fact that the fish was seconds away from becoming snake food—that’s just a minor detail. What’s important here is that the snake is a hero, and the fish is grateful for being “rescued” from the perils of water. In CNN’s world, even the most mundane events can be reimagined as tales of bravery and triumph.
Critics, of course, have been quick to point out the absurdity of this coverage. Some have even suggested that CNN is more interested in creating fairy tales than reporting the news. But in a world where ratings matter more than reality, who can blame them? After all, why bother with the truth when you can create a feel-good story that will keep viewers glued to their screens?
The Reaction: Social Media Goes Wild
As expected, CNN’s “hero snake” story has sparked a flurry of reactions on social media. Twitter users have had a field day with the headline, offering their own sarcastic takes on the situation. One user quipped, “Next on CNN: Hero mosquito saves human from the dangers of too much blood.” Another joked, “I can’t wait for CNN’s follow-up report on the heroic lion that saved a zebra from the perils of running too fast.”
Even those who typically defend CNN have found it difficult to justify this particular piece of journalism. It’s one thing to put a positive spin on a story; it’s another to completely rewrite the laws of nature in the process. Yet, despite the backlash, CNN remains steadfast in its commitment to telling “inspiring” stories. And if that means turning a snake into a hero and a fish into a damsel in distress, so be it.
But perhaps the most telling reaction came from the snake itself—if it could talk, that is. After all, what better way to encapsulate the absurdity of the situation than by imagining the snake’s confusion as it suddenly finds itself hailed as a hero for doing what snakes do best: eating.
Our Take
CNN’s reporting on the “heroic snake” incident is a perfect example of why the media’s credibility is at an all-time low. By twisting a simple act of nature into a narrative that defies logic, they’re not only insulting the intelligence of their viewers but also doing a disservice to journalism as a whole. This type of reporting is bad for the public because it further erodes trust in the media and blurs the line between fact and fiction. If we can’t rely on news outlets to report the truth, what’s the point of having them at all? In the end, CNN’s “hero snake” story may be funny, but it’s also a sad reflection of the state of modern journalism.
